Can Google Do Better Than OpenAI?

The AI battle in 2025 is definitely getting charged with the launch of Google’s Gemini 2.0 Flash and OpenAI’s o4-mini. These new models arrived weeks apart, showcasing comparable advanced features and benchmark performances. Beyond the marketing claims, this Gemini 2.0 Flash vs o4-mini comparison aims to bring out their true strengths and weaknesses by comparing their performance on real-world tasks.

What is Gemini 2.0 Flash?

Google created Gemini 2.0 Flash in an effort to address the most frequent criticism of big AI models: they are too slow for real-world applications. Rather than just simplifying their existing architecture, Google’s DeepMind team completely rethought inference processing.

Key Features of Gemini 2.0 Flash

Gemini 2.0 Flash is a lightweight and high-performance variant of the Gemini family, built for speed, efficiency, and versatility across real-time applications. Below are some of its standout features:

• Adaptive Attention Mechanism: Gemini 2.0 Flash flexibly distributes computational resources according to content complexity, in contrast to standard methods that process all tokens with identical computational intensity.
• Speculative Decoding: By employing a specialised distillation model to forecast many tokens at once and verifying them concurrently, the model significantly speeds up output creation.
• Hardware-Optimized Architecture: Specifically made for Google’s TPU v5e chips, the hardware-optimized architecture allows for previously unheard of throughput for cloud deployments.
• Multimodal Processing Pipeline: Instead of handling text, pictures, and audio independently, this pipeline uses unified encoders that pool computational resources.

Also Read: Image Generation with Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental – Not Quite What I Expected!

How to Access the Gemini 2.0 Flash?

Gemini 2.0 Flash is available across three different platforms – the Gemini chatbot interface, Google AI Studio, and Vertex AI as an API. Here’s how you can access the model on each of these platforms.

1. Via Gemini Chatbot:

• Sign in to Google Gemini with your Gmail credentials.
• 2.0 Flash is the default model chosen by Gemini when you open a new chat. If at all it is not already set, you can choose it from the model selection drop down box.

2. Via Google AI Studio (Gemini API):

• Access Google AI Studio by logging through your Google account.
• Choose “gemini-2.0-flash” from the model selection tab on the right, to open an interactive chat window.

• To gain programmatic access, install the GenAI SDK and use the following code:

from google import genai
client = genai.Client(api_key="YOUR_GEMINI_API_KEY")
resp = client.chat.create(
    model="gemini-2.0-flash",
    prompt="Hello, Gemini 2.0 Flash!"
)

3. Via Vertex AI (Cloud API):

• Use Vertex AI’s Gemini 2.0 flash prediction endpoint to include it into your apps.
• Token charging is according to the rate card for the Gemini API.

Also Read: I Tried All the Latest Gemini 2.0 Model APIs for Free

What is o4-mini?

The most recent development in OpenAI’s “o” series, the o4-mini, is geared towards improved reasoning abilities. The model was developed from the ground up to optimize reasoning performance at moderate computational requirements, and not as a condensed version of a larger model.

Key Features of o4-mini

OpenAI’s o4-mini comes with a bunch of advanced features, including:

• Internal Chain of Thought: Before producing answers, it goes through up to 10x more internal reasoning stages than conventional models.
• Tree Search Reasoning: Chooses the most promising of several reasoning paths by evaluating them all at once.
• Self-Verification Loop: Checks for mistakes and inconsistencies in its own work automatically.
• Tool Integration Architecture: Specifically good at code execution, native support for calling external tools.
• Resolving Intricate Issues: Excels at solving complex problems in programming, physics, and mathematics that stumped previous AI models.

Also Read: o3 vs o4-mini vs Gemini 2.5 pro: The Ultimate Reasoning Battle

How to Access o4-mini?

Accessing o4-mini is simple and can be done through the ChatGPT website or using the OpenAI API. Here’s how to get started:

1. Via ChatGPT Web Interface:

• To create a free account, visit https://chat.openai.com/ and sign in (or sign up).
• Open a new chat and choose the ‘Reason’ feature before entering your query. ChatGPT, by default, uses o4-mini for all ‘thinking’ prompts on the free version. However, it comes with a daily usage limit.
• ChatGPT Plus, Pro, and other paid users can choose o4-mini from the model dropdown menu at the top of the chat window to use it.

Pricing of o4-mini

OpenAI has designed o4-mini to be an affordable and efficient solution for developers, businesses, and enterprises. The model’s pricing is structured to provide results at a significantly lower cost compared to its competitors.

• In the ChatGPT web interface, o4-mini is free of charge with certain limits for free users.
• For limitless usage of o4-mini you need to have either a ChatGPT Plus ($20/month) or a Pro ($200/month) subscription.
• To use the “gpt-o4-mini” model via API, OpenAI charges $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens.

Gemini 2.0 Flash vs o4-mini: Task-Based Comparison

Now let’s get to the comparison between these two advanced models. When choosing between Gemini 2.0 Flash and o4-mini, it’s crucial to consider how these models perform across various domains. While both offer cutting-edge capabilities, their strengths may differ depending on the nature of the task. In this section, we’ll see how well both these models perform on some real-world tasks, such as:

1. Mathematical Reasoning
2. Software Development
3. Business Analytics
4. Visual Reasoning

Task 1: Mathematical Reasoning

First, let’s test both the models on their ability to solve complex mathematical problems. For this, we’ll give the same problem to both the models and compare their responses based on accuracy, speed, and other factors.

Prompt: “A cylindrical water tank with radius 3 meters and height 8 meters is filled at a rate of 2 cubic meters per minute. If the tank is initially empty, at what rate (in meters per minute) is the height of the water increasing when the tank is half full?”

Gemini 2.0 Flash Output:

o4-mini Output: 

Response Review

Comparative Analysis

Both reach the same answer, but o4-mini demonstrates better mathematical understanding and reasoning. Gemini gets there but misses why cylindrical geometry creates constant rates which reveals gaps in its reasoning.

Result: Gemini 2.0 Flash: 0 | o4-mini: 1

Task 2: Software Development

For this challenge, we’ll be testing the models on their capacity to generate clean, and efficient code.

Prompt: “Write a React component that creates a draggable to-do list with the ability to mark items as complete, delete them, and save the list to local storage. Include error handling and basic styling.”

Gemini 2.0 Flash Output:

o4-mini Output:

Response Review

Comparative Analysis

Both models created amazing solutions meeting all requirements. Gemini 2.0 Flash provides a more detailed implementation with extensive inline styles and thorough code explanations. o4-mini delivers a more concise solution using Tailwind CSS classes and additional UX Improvements like keyboard shortcuts.

Result: Gemini 2.0 Flash: 0.5 | o4-mini: 0.5

Task 3: Business Analysis

For this challenge, we’ll be assessing the model’s capabilities to analyze business problems, interpret data and propose a strategic solution based on real-world scenarios.

Prompt: “Analyze the potential impact of adopting a four-day workweek for a mid-sized software company of 250 employees. Consider productivity, employee satisfaction, financial implications, and implementation challenges.”

Gemini 2.0 Flash Output:

o4-mini Output:

Response Review

Comparative Analysis

Both models offer strong evaluations but with different approaches. Gemini provides a traditional in-depth narrative analysis focused on the Indian context, particularly Gurugram. o4-mini presents a more visually appealing response with better formatting, data references and concise categorization.

Result: Gemini 2.0 Flash: 0.5 | o4-mini: 0.5

Task 4: Visual Reasoning Test

Both the models will be given an image to identify and its working but the real question is, will it be able to identify its right name? Let’s see.

Prompt: “What is this device, how does it work, and what appears to be malfunctioning based on the visible wear patterns?”

Input Image:

Gemini 2.0 Flash Output:

o4-mini Output:

Response Review

Comparative Analysis

The models disagree on what the device is. o4-mini’s identification as a power steering pump is correct based on the component’s design and features. o4-mini shows better attention to visual details and provides more relevant analysis of the actual components shown.

Result: Gemini 2.0 Flash: 0 | o4-mini: 1

Final Verdict: Gemini 2.0 Flash: 1 | o4-mini: 3

Comparison Summary

Overall, o4-mini demonstrates superior reasoning capabilities and accuracy across most tasks, while Gemini 2.0 Flash offers competitive performance with its main advantage being significantly faster response times.

Login to continue reading and enjoy expert-curated content.

Keep Reading for Free